MAINE-DARTMOUTH FAMILY MEDICINE RESIDENCY ADVANCEMENT COMMITTEE RESIDENT EVALUATION REVIEW FORM
MOCK/draft
Resident: wrkjbskbskjjh
Advisor: Jenny Pisculli
Last evaluation date: 12/08
Evaluation date: 4/29/09
Advisor Meeting:
Advisor Meeting: May 12, 2009
Committee member presenting: Jenny Pisculli
COMMENTS ON INDIVIDUALIZED LEARNING PLAN:
Looking to do a Plus 1 then maybe locums in New Zealand, ultimately wants a private/group practice including OB and peds
self- assessed weaknesss - medical knowledge and professionalism (running late in clinic)
self-assessed strengths - patient care and interpersonal/communication skills
Feels she knees more peds and OB --> goal is schedule some calls on OB, do additional month in Nashua or peds
more rheumatology, gyn, planning short 1-2 week electives in Diabetes/nutrition, ophtalmolgy, nephology, wound clinic, cardiology
CURRICULUM REQUIREMENTS: ¶Longitudinal curriculum (Nursing home visits)?y/n ¶Required supplemental study completed?y/n
COMPETENCIES: I. PATIENT CARE 1 – Rotation Evaluations (comments from 6 – ER W) Difference in level of responsibilities given Nuki and Kimpel particularly good
7 – Peds Augusta – ¾ (4 in interpersonal communication with families)
Comments: connected with families
3/4 – 4’s in professionalism Salvato excellent teacher – Chi – helping her find her weaknesses and addressing them
8 – ICU -3/4
Comments: suberb interpersonal skills KM’s comments – Definite difference in level of interest in teaching – Brassard, LaCombe, are great – some scut work from another attending
9 – NF/SHR – 4
Comments: role model
KM’s comments on NF ¾ (4s for support from faculty) – would like responsibilities outlined (dictating end of service notes, updating patient lists, holding orders) SHR: 2-4 concern that some responsibilities of FMI were “turfed” to night float at the end of the day. Overall education= 4
10 – EKG 3/4 (4’s in knowledge)
Enthusiastic learner. KM’s comments – fantastic rotation, Jim is great teacher “able to let us fumble” no need for changes for improvement
2. Chart Audits HPI – adequate, good, great, detailed – not too wordy review one sample from her work?
Physical adequate – except one – no rectal exam
Billing ok except OMT
Notes good
3. Patient volume As of 2/28/09
Mix of F:M is 68.5%:31/5%
On track with 777 visits by Jan 09.
4. Procedure logs Met requirement for OB deliveries and continuity
Ok for NH and home visits
II. MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE Passed Comlex I, II, III ( 653 and 89)
In training exam – 63%
Global Rotation Evaluations (?)
III. PRACTICE BASED LEARNING Resident evaluations –
FMI – “good team player” would like to see more teaching
SHR – organized, use of laptop during signout “brilliant” some stress seen “always aware of all cases, great oversight, of the six seniors I’ve seen on medicine she stands out for efficiency and professionalism” Conference attendance –
127 by rotation 10
Procedure lists are up to date.
IV. INTERPERSONAL AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS 3 evaluations/observations –
1) knee pain – 3s, appropriate
2) 3s/4s “you were able to keep her on tract despite vague answers”, supported her good decisions
Appropriate care in a difficulty patient, good interview style while on computer
3) meeting a patient for the first time – good interaction and bonding while actually putting info into computer
V. PROFESSIONALISM OMT training?
Medical records – usually less than 5 tasks, never had any messages.
Evaluated by full faculty on 4/29/09 (before genesis of Advancement Committee) where they discussed hnkdk’s concern for wanting more OMT training. Possible opportunities to work with Mark S and Kat B next year. Know that she and Zack are planning on doing an OMT fellowship – currently looking at programs.No concerns brought up by larger group. Previous concerns still present the biggest being potential burnout while chief.
Face-to-Face meeting with resident on Tuesday May 12 – We reviewed vdksh's IEP and mostly discussed progress toward graduation (meeting goals) plans for next year: how to schedule no call pool and other electives. Filling in possible gaps in education – working with diabetes center, wound clinic, possible short elective with podiatry. She would like to go to the Himalayas with Guy Nuki, working on possible schedule now. Also discussed a particularly difficult pregnant patient (recently delivered) and that experience.
Targets for the next evaluation include: ¶
Overall, snkhsghk is a strong resident, a great addition to the clinic, provides thoughtful, appropriate compassionate treatment to a difficult patient population. She has taken on difficult patients with the suboxone dependent pregnant patients and is clearly a patient advocate.
ADVANCEMENT COMMITTEE
RESIDENT EVALUATION REVIEW FORM
Resident: wrkjbskbskjjh
Advisor: Jenny Pisculli
Last evaluation date: 12/08
Evaluation date: 4/29/09
Advisor Meeting:
Advisor Meeting: May 12, 2009
Committee member presenting: Jenny Pisculli
COMMENTS ON INDIVIDUALIZED LEARNING PLAN:
Looking to do a Plus 1 then maybe locums in New Zealand, ultimately wants a private/group practice including OB and peds
self- assessed weaknesss - medical knowledge and professionalism (running late in clinic)
self-assessed strengths - patient care and interpersonal/communication skills
Feels she knees more peds and OB --> goal is schedule some calls on OB, do additional month in Nashua or peds
more rheumatology, gyn, planning short 1-2 week electives in Diabetes/nutrition, ophtalmolgy, nephology, wound clinic, cardiology
CURRICULUM REQUIREMENTS:
¶ Longitudinal curriculum (Nursing home visits)? y/n
¶ Required supplemental study completed? y/n
COMPETENCIES:
I. PATIENT CARE
1 – Rotation Evaluations
(comments from 6 – ER W)
Difference in level of responsibilities given Nuki and Kimpel particularly good
7 – Peds Augusta – ¾ (4 in interpersonal communication with families)
Comments: connected with families
3/4 – 4’s in professionalism
Salvato excellent teacher – Chi – helping her find her weaknesses and addressing them
8 – ICU -3/4
Comments: suberb interpersonal skills
KM’s comments – Definite difference in level of interest in teaching – Brassard, LaCombe, are great – some scut work from another attending
9 – NF/SHR – 4
Comments: role model
KM’s comments on NF ¾ (4s for support from faculty) – would like responsibilities outlined (dictating end of service notes, updating patient lists, holding orders)
SHR: 2-4 concern that some responsibilities of FMI were “turfed” to night float at the end of the day.
Overall education= 4
10 – EKG 3/4 (4’s in knowledge)
Enthusiastic learner.
KM’s comments – fantastic rotation, Jim is great teacher “able to let us fumble” no need for changes for improvement
2. Chart Audits
HPI – adequate, good, great, detailed – not too wordy review one sample from her work?
Physical adequate – except one – no rectal exam
Billing ok except OMT
Notes good
3. Patient volume
As of 2/28/09
Mix of F:M is 68.5%:31/5%
On track with 777 visits by Jan 09.
4. Procedure logs
Met requirement for OB deliveries and continuity
Ok for NH and home visits
II. MEDICAL KNOWLEDGE
Passed Comlex I, II, III ( 653 and 89)
In training exam – 63%
Global Rotation Evaluations (?)
III. PRACTICE BASED LEARNING
Resident evaluations –
FMI – “good team player” would like to see more teaching
SHR – organized, use of laptop during signout “brilliant” some stress seen “always aware of all cases, great oversight, of the six seniors I’ve seen on medicine she stands out for efficiency and professionalism”
Conference attendance –
127 by rotation 10
Procedure lists are up to date.
IV. INTERPERSONAL AND COMMUNICATION SKILLS
3 evaluations/observations –
1) knee pain – 3s, appropriate
2) 3s/4s “you were able to keep her on tract despite vague answers”, supported her good decisions
Appropriate care in a difficulty patient, good interview style while on computer
3) meeting a patient for the first time – good interaction and bonding while actually putting info into computer
V. PROFESSIONALISM
OMT training?
Medical records – usually less than 5 tasks, never had any messages.
Evaluated by full faculty on 4/29/09 (before genesis of Advancement Committee) where they discussed hnkdk’s concern for wanting more OMT training. Possible opportunities to work with Mark S and Kat B next year. Know that she and Zack are planning on doing an OMT fellowship – currently looking at programs. No concerns brought up by larger group. Previous concerns still present the biggest being potential burnout while chief.
Face-to-Face meeting with resident on Tuesday May 12 – We reviewed vdksh's IEP and mostly discussed progress toward graduation (meeting goals) plans for next year: how to schedule no call pool and other electives. Filling in possible gaps in education – working with diabetes center, wound clinic, possible short elective with podiatry. She would like to go to the Himalayas with Guy Nuki, working on possible schedule now. Also discussed a particularly difficult pregnant patient (recently delivered) and that experience.
Targets for the next evaluation include:
¶
Overall, snkhsghk is a strong resident, a great addition to the clinic, provides thoughtful, appropriate compassionate treatment to a difficult patient population. She has taken on difficult patients with the suboxone dependent pregnant patients and is clearly a patient advocate.